This article is proof that education and positive pressure can help to shape policy and encourage legislators to vote prolife. Pro-abortion candidates and legislators and other office holders need to replaced by those open to the prolife message. This article can be used to encourage and assure candidates that being prolife is indeed good company! Also, the recent news story available at www.priestsforlife.org shows that Americans view abortion as “morally wrong.” Poll shows most see abortion as “morally wrong”
A May 26 Gallup poll of what the public finds to be “morally acceptable” or “morally wrong.” By a margin of 50% to 38%, the public finds abortion to be morally wrong….
NY Times article
The NY Times is running an article summarizing pro-life legislative successes at the state level this year. It notes that 11 states have passed pro-life laws, calling that “an unusually high number of victories.”
Abortion Foes Advance Cause at State Level
Nati Harnik/Associated Press
Nebraska approved a ban on all abortions after 20 weeks, on the grounds of fetal pain.
By JOHN LELAND
Published: June 2, 2010
At least 11 states have passed laws this year regulating or restricting abortion, giving opponents of abortion what partisans on both sides of the issue say is an unusually high number of victories. In four additional states, bills have passed at least one house of the legislature.
Kim Smith of Norman, Okla., listened to the debate in the State Senate on an override of a veto on an abortion bill last week.
In a flurry of activity last week, Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi signed a bill barring insurers from covering abortion in the new insurance exchanges called for under the federal health care overhaul, and the Oklahoma Legislature overrode a veto by Gov. Brad Henry of a bill requiring doctors who perform abortions to answer 38 questions about each procedure, including the women’s reasons for ending their pregnancies.
It was the third abortion measure this session on which the Legislature overrode a veto by Mr. Henry.
At least 13 other states have introduced or passed similar legislation this year. The new laws range from an Arizona ban on coverage of abortion in the state employees’ health plan to a ban in Nebraska on all abortions after 20 weeks, on the grounds that the fetus at that stage can feel pain.
Fetal pain is a subject of debate in the medical community, and the United States Supreme Court has recognized the government’s right to ban abortions only after a fetus becomes viable, which is more than a month later.
“The right-to-life folks are seeing just how far they can push things,” said Joseph W. Dellapenna, a law professor at Villanova University and the author of “Dispelling the Myths of Abortion History.” Professor Dellapenna said it was “almost a certainty” that one of the laws would end up in front of the Supreme Court, where Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s views on abortion are untested, as are those of Elena Kagan, President Obama’s new court nominee.
“It could turn out they can push things a lot farther than people think,” he said. “Or, it could not.”
While opponents of abortion rights hope ultimately to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that guarantees a woman’s right to an abortion, they have made the most impact at the state level, where laws passed in one state often appear in other legislatures in subsequent years. State laws also have the potential for national consequences by setting off court battles that challenge or limit the scope of Roe.
“Ninety percent of pro-life legislation happens at the states,” said Daniel S. McConchie, vice president for government affairs at Americans United for Life, which opposes abortion. “While Congress is the main focus of attention for so many people in the country, state legislatures have greatest impact on daily lives, and life-related legislation is no exception.”
Much of this year’s legislation arose from a 2007 United States Supreme Court decision upholding a federal ban on a late-term procedure that critics call partial-birth abortion, which gave lawmakers greater leeway to restrict abortion.
About 370 state bills regulating abortion were introduced in 2010, compared with about 350 in each of the previous five years, and 250 a year in the early 1990s, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights. At least 24 of this year’s bills have passed, and the final total may reach the high of 2005, when states passed 34 laws, said Elizabeth Nash, a public policy associate at the institute.
More significant than the number of bills introduced are the number and nature of those that passed, partisans on both sides agree.
“What’s different is that bills of serious consequence have actually passed,” said Nancy Northrup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, who characterized the volume of legislation as “an avalanche.” Already the center has brought suits to challenge six laws, more than in any other year since the 1990s.
Tennessee, which had not passed restrictions on abortion since 2003, passed two laws, one banning coverage of abortion in health insurance exchanges. The other requires clinics to post signs stating it is illegal to coerce a woman to have an abortion; 11 other states introduced similar legislation.
“This is a good year as far as victories,” said Mary Spaulding Balch, director of state legislation for the National Right to Life Committee, who named several states, including Arizona, Missouri and Tennessee, that are now more open to restrictive laws. “I do get the impression that the climate is friendlier.”
Eighteen states passed or introduced bills requiring counseling before abortions, according to the Guttmacher Institute.
Arizona, where Janet Napolitano vetoed abortion restrictions as governor, passed four laws this year under Jan Brewer, who became governor in 2009 after Ms. Napolitano resigned to become the secretary of homeland security. The four include restrictions on coverage under health insurance exchanges, state employee insurance and Medicaid, and call for stricter reporting requirements for doctors who perform abortions.
Oklahoma passed seven laws, three over vetoes by the governor, including one requiring a woman to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a detailed description of the fetus before an abortion. The law requires that the ultrasound screen be visible to the woman, though she may avert her eyes. Another new law prevents parents from suing doctors for not revealing fetal abnormalities during pregnancy. An eighth measure drew the governor’s fourth veto last week; the Legislature adjourned on Friday without addressing it.
The ultrasound law “takes the burden away from the mother of having to request to see it,” Ms. Balch said. “That’s significant, because the harder you make it for the mother to view it, she’s not going to view it. Many women regret their abortions afterward, and that’s from looking later at an ultrasound.”
Opponents say the law requires an unnecessary medical procedure and takes away women’s right to make decisions for themselves. A state judge suspended the law after a legal challenge.
Lawsuits are likely to be filed against Nebraska’s law banning abortion after 20 weeks. “That’s pretty clearly designed to mount a challenge to women’s right to choose in the second trimester,” which the Supreme Court has recognized, said Ted Miller, a spokesman for Naral Pro-Choice America, a national advocacy organization. “It’s a whole new standard.”
State Senator Mike Flood of Nebraska said he conceived the legislation after hearing public remarks by LeRoy Carhart, an abortion provider in Bellvue, Neb., who said he hoped to continue the work of George Tiller, the Kansas doctor who was murdered a year ago and who provided late-term abortions for women from all over the country.
“I was obviously troubled by his intention to perform those types of abortions,” Mr. Flood said. “My immediate thought was those should be illegal in Nebraska.”
After some research he came upon the idea of banning abortion once a fetus can feel pain, though much of the medical community says that this does not happen before the third trimester, about 28 weeks.
In Utah, after a pregnant 17-year-old paid a man $150 to beat her in an effort to induce a miscarriage, legislators passed a law that would allow a woman in such circumstances to be charged with homicide. Ms. Balch of the National Right to Life Committee said her organization did not support that law because it penalized the woman, “and we don’t support that at all.” Similar legislation was introduced in two other states.
Over all, abortions in America have been falling since 1990. In recent years, according to research by the Guttmacher Institute, they have been increasingly concentrated among poor women, whose rates have gone up even as the overall national rate has declined.