Townhall.com on the high road…






Following up on the incident with Townhall.com and Prelutsky, seems like Townhall.com wasn’t in agreement with the types of things Prelutsky was saying, after all… And again, I found Prelutsky’s remarks very offensive to say the least. Alveda

Here’s what Burt Prelutsky wrote in his Townhall.com column –

It’s not just the politicians, but also their mates, so long as they’re Democrats, who get the star treatment. Take Michelle Obama…please. Every time I turn around, there she is on a magazine cover. Now, normally, like the Mafia, I lay off the spouses, but inasmuch as this particular spouse attended the same racist church as her hubby for 20 years, I’ll make an exception in her case. After all, in spite of the fact that affirmative action got her an Ivy League degree and a $7,000-a-week salary and, moreover, has sent billions of dollars for no particularly good reason to Africa, she insists this is a mean country.
Naturally, the left-wing media is now trying to convince us that this James Brown-look-alike has all the allure, glamour and fashion sense of Jackie Kennedy. I have even heard her upper arms described in the sort of language Wordsworth devoted to flowers in the morning dew and that Keats lavished on nightingales. Frankly, if I were Mrs. Obama and the geeks started rhapsodizing about my triceps, I might consider wearing sleeves.
But there’s no getting around the fact that Barack is the bigger menace….

The entire column is available at:

http://townhall.com/columnists/BurtPrelutsky/2009/03/22/let_us_not_praise_famous_men_-_or_women

You’ll notice that the two lines calling Michelle Obama a bad name do not appear. That’s because one was a fabrication and TownHall either censored the other before publishing the Prelutsky column or deleted it after publishing it. Whichever is the case, the offending line is currently not on the TownHall.com website.

If you look at Prelutsky’s original column, which he has posted on his own blog, the above excerpt reads as follows:

It’s not just the politicians, but also their mates, so long as they’re Democrats, who get the star treatment. Take Michelle Obama…please. Every time I turn around, there she is on a magazine cover. Now, normally, like the Mafia, I lay off the spouses, but inasmuch as this particular spouse attended the same racist church as her hubby for 20 years, I’ll make an exception in her case. After all, in spite of the fact that affirmative action got her an Ivy League degree and a $7,000-a-week salary and, moreover, has sent billions of dollars for no particularly good reason to Africa, she insists this is a mean country. The burning question in my circle is: if the First Family gets a female dog, will she be the First Bitch or will she have to settle for second place?

Naturally, the left-wing media is now trying to convince us that this James Brown-look-alike has all the allure, glamour and fashion sense of Jackie Kennedy. I have even heard her upper arms described in the sort of language Wordsworth devoted to flowers in the morning dew and that Keats lavished on nightingales. Frankly, if I were Mrs. Obama and the geeks started rhapsodizing about my triceps, I might consider wearing sleeves.

But there’s no getting around the fact that Barack is the bigger menace….

The above is taken from Prelutsky’s blog of April 16, 2009, available at www.burtprelutsky.com , then going to his blog archive (on the right side of the page) and clicking on April 2009.

We see here that the sentence, “She’s not pretty, for heaven’s sakes! She’s black! She’s a black bitch!” does not appear. This second offensive sentence was apparently made up by someone and added to make it look like it was part of the original column.

A few other points –

1) The author, Burt Prelutsky, is Jewish, not Christian. He’s mentioned his religion in several columns.

2) Burt Prelutsky was terminated by TownHall.com sometime this summer. Prelutsky wrote of his termination in an August 26 column at his new internet home, WorldNetDaily.com. That column is available at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107914 He thinks his termination had something to do with a column he wrote about Islam.

3) Whatever one wants to say about Prelutsky, TownHall.com seems to have taken the high ground here. It either deleted the line calling Michelle Obama a bad name from Prelutsky’s column before publishing it or after publishing it. The line is not there now. Prelutsky’s columns were carried at different internet sites last April, TownHall being only one of them. Another site or Prelutsky’s own blog surely carried the offensive lines, but it does not appear that TownHall did. Perhaps the author of the attachment you sent saw the Prelutsky column somewhere and just assumed that TownHall reprinted it in whole.

From: – Alveda King –
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 10:58 PM

Subject: RE: Racist statements against Michele Obama & others

There is a lot of buzz about African American voices who disagree with President Obama’s position on abortion and family values. Some are calling us Uncle Toms, and other things. On the other hand, The Obama’s are being called nasty names, and people are wondering where or why the African American “conservatives” are not speaking out about that. Actually, we are saying that insults and name calling by anybody won’t help resolve anything. We are asking people to stop the verbal abuse and deal with the issues. On both sides, on every side. Let’s stop the insults and deal with the issues.
Here are a couple of mails received, and responses:
Mail 1. Dear HU, Thanks for your mail regarding Burt Perlutsky’s Townhall.com column. For the record, it is very wrong and unchristian to call the First Lady a —ch. I am sorry to hear this. I am copying below a response to a recent op-ed that was brought to my attention, along with my response. However, I do not believe it is racist to disagree with the President’s stand on certain issues. For instance, I do not agree with his position regarding the civil rights of unborn babies and the choice to kill them. My position is not racist, in that I also don’t agree with the Speaker of the House and others who share the same views as the President’s. This position has nothing to do with their skin color, but rather their views on personhood. It is wrong, however not to give respect to their respective offices. As to racism, there is one race on the planet, human. We are fighting the racism battle based on the lie that we are separate races. If you check my website for an open letter we wrote to the President, along with a press conference with several African Americans who voted for him, you will see my position on many issues. I also pray for the President and his family, for their well being, and that they will include unborn babies in their representation of the people. www.africanamericanoutreach.com. Alveda King
Mail 2: Dear Mr. Jackson, I read with interest your recent op-ed on Blacks running from race while running in a race. I noted just a few things:
1. I did write that Joe Wilson’s remarks were inappropriate.
2. I did speak out against calling the Obamas monkeys. What a disgrace!
3. Not only do we embrace our heritage, we are fighting to keep the African American community, and indeed generations of all human families from becoming extinct from abortion, sickness, poverty, disease, domestic abuse, etc. Even as far as the Chicago not getting the Olympics thing goes: I believe we should be sad that a boy was recently beat to death in Chicago, and trying to stop the violence of gang murder, and womb murder, and all the violence against our children, maybe even before we worry about gettting the Olympic games in place. The Olympic loss was not cause for celebration, neither is all the violence going on.
4. As to calling these candidates “Uncle Toms” the real history of Uncle Tom was that he was killed for fighting racism in his day. Check out: Thursday, October 1, 2009 America Needs More Uncle Toms! at: http://talkaboutitcd.blogspot.com/
5. Many of us (African Americans for life, liberty and freedom for the babies in the womb, and for healthy procreative lives) are focused on our defund Planned Parenthood population control/genocide/ eugenics agenda outlined in the recently released documentary maafa21 and are working to keep abortion and euthanasia out of the health care bill.) Perhaps you may have time to review our comments on C-Span and youtube at:

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2009/08/18/Health/A/22359/National+Black+ProLife+Union+Priests+for+Life+Health+Care+Press+Conference.aspx

I am asking that you view the video maafa21 which I have provided for you. I would like to discuss it with you. Thank you. Alveda King
Black Republicans Running From Race
October 15, 2009
Raynard Jackson
Black Republicans running for various offices this election cycle seem to be running from race while running their race. This is one of the most asinine things I have ever seen, but not unexpected. This is why Black Republicans have no credibility within their own community.
Last week I was interviewed by Kelley Beaucar Vlahos of FOXNews.com. The story was published this past Monday (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/12/carter-obama-allen-west-race-card/ ).
I was appalled at the comments of these Black office seekers and their obvious lack of understanding of how their words would be interpreted by those in the Black community. Allen West, a retired Army colonel running against Democratic Congressman Ron Klein (FL-22nd), said, “Since (Democrats) have thrown out the race card, it has made me more appealing..because it shows the contrast of our principles-how different we are even though we both have permanent tans (referring to President Obama).” West continued, “A lot of people who don’t want to be part of Obama’s policies are being called racist..Then they say, Hey, this guy, Colonel West-he’s Black and I support him.. It has nothing to do with race.People don’t care about your color, they care about your character.”
But, Colonel West, WAIT! You said it was not about race, then you say you’re Black, therefore people in your district are supporting you (because you are Black). Which is it? So, let me make sure I understand you. White people are supporting you because you are Black so that you can speak out against the Black president, so the white people won’t have to (because they can’t call you a racist since you are Black). Oh, I get it now. You know we have a term for people like that and it begins with the word UNCLE!
Ryan Frazier is a 31 year old city councilman in Colorado and is running for the U.S. Senate in the Republican primary. Frazier said that being Black is an asset. So when he opposes the president’s policies, no one can call him a racist. According to Frazier, “I don’t think they will be able to use that argument against me or engage in those tactics against me.” So, let me interpret this. Because of the skin color that you say doesn’t matter, you are able to criticize the president because of the very skin color that you say doesn’t matter? Ok, now I understand.
Michael Williams has served several terms as Texas Railroad Commissioner and is currently running for the U.S. Senate seat that current senator Kay Hutchinson is vacating to run for governor. He states that his Blackness will be an asset. According to the article, “one of the things it allows me to do..it allows me to speak very, very frankly about what I believe, and what I feel, and nobody is going to call me a racist.” Again, I am confused. His Blackness is only an asset when it comes to denigrating a Black president and his policies. According to Williams, other than giving him cover in criticizing the president, his race doesn’t exist. Wow, either he is color blind or just blind to people of color.
Do these guys hear themselves and how ridiculous they sound? Have you ever heard of a Jewish candidate denying or distancing themselves from their own heritage? Or a Latino or Asian? These groups use their ethnicity to endear themselves to voters from their group while at the same time building coalitions to expand their base of support.
Can you be against the president’s policies and not be a racist? Without question. But, I challenge these candidates to answer a few questions for me.
What does describing Obama as a Nazi have to do with healthcare? What does calling him a liar during a joint session of Congress have to do with healthcare? How does calling him a socialist, fascist, or communist, further the healthcare debate? So, you would think that if this debate was about healthcare, the signs at town hall meetings and rallies would read, “how will you pay for your plan, Mr. President, how will it be implemented, or what if I don’t want your plan?” Those would be legitimate questions.
Another question for the candidates, are there any public statements by them speaking out against the actions of Congressman Joe Wilson during the president’s speech before a joint session of Congress?
Are there any public statements by them chastising individuals and party officials for some of the incendiary rhetoric coming from Republicans (Barak the Magic Negro, calling Michelle Obama a monkey, or the celebration by many conservatives that Chicago was eliminated from Olympic consideration)?
Just wondering because I know they all claim to be candidates of great principles and I know they would stand up for right because they are the voice of the people, right?
Finally, can you tell me if you have any Blacks on your paid campaign staffs with hiring or decision making authority? Are you spending any campaign money with Black vendors (office supplies, computer services, restaurants, caterers, etc)? Are there any Black banks in your area that you are utilizing?
I would be stunned if any of the campaigns could answer yes to these questions. But, this is my offer to them. I am offering 30 minutes of air time on my radios how (www.ustalknetwork.com ) to each candidate to address these issues and talk about their campaigns.
So, while you are running your race, please don’t continue to forget your race!






Leave a Comment

*