Universal Declaration of Human Rights
has the right to be recognized as a person before the law. This, of course, was directly contradicted by the holding of the US Supreme Court, Roe vs. Wade, when it said, "[T]he word person, as used in the Fourteenth Amendment, does not
include the unborn."
In articles 18 and 19, the Universal Declaration
asserts the right of each person to freedom of religion and opinion on various
matters, and the right to exercise that religion and express that opinion. Later
in the Declaration, however, Article 30 rightfully states, "Nothing in this
Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any
right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction
of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein." For example, if I
claimed to practice a religion that required me to kill another human being
every Sunday as part of the worship service, although I have freedom of
religion, I do not have the right to destroy the life of the other human being.
This applies also to abortion. The right to life,
which is inherent and incapable of being annulled by any government, may not be
trampled upon in the name of religious freedom. It is a favorite position of the
defenders of abortion to claim their "right to believe what they want" and to
"have their own opinion" about the status and value of the child in the womb.
But the right of someone to live cannot fall simply because someone else s
belief does not recognize that right.
Sixty years after this Universal Declaration, let
us renew our efforts to bring all nations to a strong respect for each person s
inherent rights, most fundamentally the right to life.
More Columns for 2008