I support adult stem cell research. As a veterinarian, I have a
special appreciation for scientific research that produces results
and cures diseases. Research using adult stem cells has produced
results that have the potential to cure numerous diseases. According
to Dr. Donald Orlic of the National Human Genome Research Institute,
scientists have found that adult stem cells from the bone marrow of
adult mice can rebuild a damaged heart by creating new heart muscle
and blood vessels. Dr. Orlic stated that “this latest research shows
that the embryos, which are politically controversial, may not be
necessary. We are currently finding that these adult stem cells can
function as well, perhaps even better than, embryonic stem cells.”
FLOOR STATEMENT: Stem Cell Research
April 11th, 2007 -
Mr. President, I rise today to clarify my position on stem cell
research. As a veterinarian I understand the need for research and
scientific advancement. Current law does not prohibit any sort of
stem cell research. In fact, all forms of stem cell research have
flourished under current law.
I can not and will not support legislation that would drive
abortion. Therefore I cannot support S. 5. This legislation would
allow for federal dollars to be used to incentivize the further
destruction of human embryos for research purposes. I do not support
this use of federal funds. I will not oppose private industry from
doing embryonic stem cell research, but it would be very
irresponsible to use federal taxpayer dollars to fund such a
contentious issue.
Science is advancing. Over the past weeks and months research using
adult stem cells has had many breakthroughs. The use of amniotic
fluid and placental stem cells has much of the same potential that
embryonic stem cells have, but they are not as controversial. S. 30
provides resources to further research in the area of adult stem
cell research. Because of the emphasis on adult stem cell research,
I support S. 30 and will vote in favor of S. 30 later today.
I not only understand the need for scientific advancement, but also
for ethical boundaries. We should not be using federal dollars to
drive abortion, when there are alternative opportunities for
scientific advancement that are not as contentious.
Back
