Priests for Life - Educational Resources
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
Columns
Fr. Frank Pavone
Fr. Peter West
Fr. Denis G. Wilde, OSA
Fr. Walter Quinn, OSA

Newsletters

Brochures

Articles
Contraception
Death Penalty
Euthanasia

Books

Church Documents

Inspiring Stories

Audio

Video
OTHER SECTIONS
America Will Not Reject Abortion Until America
Sees Abortion


Prayer Campaign

Join our Facebook Cause
"Pray to End Abortion"


Take Action

Social Networking

Rachel's Vineyard,
A Ministry of Priests For Life


Silent No More Awareness Campaign, A Project
of Priests For Life

Clergy Resources
SIGN UP FOR EMAIL


 

Albuquerque, Lead the Way!

¡Albuquerque, Encabeza el Camino!

 

Fr. Frank Pavone
National Director, Priests for Life

November 18, 2013

Listen

   
 
As I often say, the last thing abortion supporters want to talk about is abortion.

The level of abstraction in which defenders of abortion take refuge is at times as comical as it is tragic and irresponsible. Take, for instance, Daniel Maguire’s book Sacred Choices. Rather than face up to what the “choice” of abortion is and describe it concretely, the author discusses why he thinks “the Roman Catholic position on abortion is pluralistic” and writes about things like Pope Gregory IX’s Decretals of 1230, or the Christian Penitentials of the early Middle Ages, or “global poisoning.” How about describing the poisoning of the child in the womb? How about describing what the abortionists say about abortion before trying to justify it by an abstract comparison of Roman Catholic statements or of “Dharma,” “Karma,” “Ahimsa,” “Yin and Yang,” and “Zakat and Hay’a”?

Or take Daniel Dombrowski and Robert Deltete’s book A Brief, Liberal, Catholic Defense of Abortion.  To give you a taste of how unwilling these authors are to actually describe the procedure they claim to defend, consider that in a chapter titled “Importance of Temporal Asymmetry,” they say, “[A]s Thomists might put it, nerve cells alone do not constitute the sense organs that provide the dispositio materiae  for hominization to occur.” (p. 56). Enlightening. How about exploring the “asymmetry” that takes place when an unborn little girl’s arm is twisted and pulled off the rest of her body by the surgical forceps?

No doubt, those who are trying to keep voters from voting to protect such children in the city of Albuquerque this Tuesday (November 19, 2013) will resort to abstract arguments and talk about anything except the violence that the voters can now bring to an end.

The voters of Albuquerque will be able to enact, on the local level, a measure that protects children in the womb who can feel pain (that is, from 20 weeks of fetal age forward). These children would be protected from the forceps of the abortionist who, in these late term abortions, goes into the womb, grabs an arm or leg, and tears it off the living child. It's barbaric.

And it's true. Consider this quote from a well-known medical textbook on abortion:

"The procedure changes significantly at 21 weeks because the fetal tissues become much more cohesive and difficult to dismember. …. The calvaria [head] is no longer the principal problem; it can be collapsed. Other structures, such as the pelvis, present more difficulty….A long curved Mayo scissors may be necessary to decapitate and dismember the fetus…" (From the medical textbook Abortion Practice – Dr. Warren Hern, p.154)

This procedure is occurring legally in Albuquerque, and it's time to stop it. Pass along this quote, as well as the diagram you find at www.priestsforlife.org/resources/medical/deexplanation.htm to as many people as possible.

Brothers and sisters of Albuquerque, lead the way! Come out on Tuesday and vote to protect your (our) children! Let's end this violence, in Albuquerque and in every other city as well!

Related:

   
 
Help us spread the word. Share this with your social network.
   
  Back


Priests for Life
PO Box 141172 • Staten Island, NY 10314
Tel. 888-735-3448, (718) 980-4400 • Fax 718-980-6515
mail@priestsforlife.org