Priests for Life - News
News Home

Pro-life News Sources

Priests for Life Press Releases

Priests for Life News Archive

Sources for Local, National, and International Pro-Life News and Commentary
Pro-Life Action
League News Page

Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (C-FAM)
Society for the Protection of Unborn Children
Pro-life Radio News
Life-Talk (Life Dynamics)
Pro-life Perspective (National Right to Life)  
America Will Not Reject Abortion Until America
Sees Abortion

Prayer Campaign

Take Action

Social Networking

Rachel's Vineyard,
A Ministry of Priests For Life

Silent No More Awareness Campaign, A Project
of Priests For Life

Clergy Resources


Supreme Court Order in Priests for Life vs. HHS (Part of Zubik vs. Burwell).. Further Comments from Priests for Life

Sacerdotes por La Vida emite comentarios adicionales sobre el Caso del Mandato HHS de la Corte Suprema.


Priests for Life


Priests for Life, the first group of the 37 Supreme Court petitioners in Zubik vs. Burwell to challenge the HHS mandate in court, has responded to today's action by the Court in this consolidated case.
Robert Muise, of the American Freedom Law Center, which has represented Priests for Life in this case from the beginning, explained, "The Court's action today continues to protect us from this unjust mandate, and from any punishment for not obeying it. It gives us a chance now to work out in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, whose ruling against us is now vacated, a solution that will continue to protect our religious freedom. As we have always said, because the very mission of Priests for Life is to advance a culture free from any kind of abortion, this organization continues to be a perfectly situated petitioner to object to the mandate."
Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life, and also a personal petitioner in the case, added, "We are encouraged by today's development. The Supreme Court could have ruled against us, but evidently the Obama Administration did not succeed in persuading them to do so. A split Court could also have let the lower court's negative ruling stand, but again, they did not see fit to do that. Instead, the Supreme Court, upon receiving further briefings, vacated the lower court rulings, and offered the parties an opportunity to work out a mutually acceptable solution in the lower courts, that will both allow the government to pursue its objectives and allow us to practice our faith. We are committed to continuing that process in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit."
Janet Morana, Executive Director of Priests for Life, and also a personal petitioner in the case, stated, "In April, we told the Supreme Court that if the government and the insurance companies are going to provide free coverage of abortion-inducing drugs and contraceptives, they have to do it without any involvement from us, and without hijacking the insurance plan we offer our employees. Moreover, the government also told the Court that modifications to the accommodation would be possible. So now, we look forward to the next step of this process, which we hope will find a more reasonable response by the government than we have seen up to now."
Evangelist Alveda King is also a personal petitioner in the Priests for Life vs. HHS case. She is the niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Director of "Civil Rights for the Unborn," the outreach of Priests for Life to the African-American community. Alveda stated, "Today's action is another step forward in the cause of freedom, because the Court did not rule against it. We are not out of the woods yet, because there may still be resistance from the government. But we believe that the government can pursue its objectives without forcing us to choose between following the law and following our faith. The case of Priests for Life vs. HHS is about freedom, and we are confident of final victory."  
Help us spread the word. Share this with your social network.

Click here to leave a comment

Ed Randle says:
5/18/2016 5:39:02 AM
Would it be possible to have judges perform an abortion on a model fetus while hearing and seeing an ultra sound of a living baby? How can the feelings of another be understood without knowing the experience? To talk of religious freedom is not the same as understanding the feelings that convictions present.

Would it be good to explain what an abortionist does at an elementary school career day to try and recruit for that field of work? If something is not good to teach a child, does it help teach that it is not a good thing for society?

I try to think of how to teach the wise what they do not understand. How can judges be moved to decide what is best?
God help you in your work.

Sandra LeBlanc says:
5/17/2016 7:25:23 PM
Thank God and the Supreme Court inspired by Him. Will continue to pray!!

Philip Lancaster says:
5/17/2016 8:59:47 AM
May God continue to bless you, all of you, and the work you are doing.


Priests for Life
PO Box 236695 • Cocoa, FL 32923
Tel. 321-500-1000, Toll Free 888-735-3448 •