Following is the central portion of text for a full-page ad which Priests
for Life has purchased in USA Today for Thursday, November 2, 2000.
What does support for the "Right to Choose" say about a candidate's
character?
During this election season, we've heard a lot about the importance of
"character." Strangely, though, there hasn't been any mention of the
relationship between a candidate's character and his/her support of the "right
to choose."
In the 27 years since Roe v. Wade legalized abortion in the U.S., a mountain
of information has been amassed attesting to the fact that abortion is the
violent killing of a child and is damaging to the mother. A leader's continued
support for the "right to choose" in light of this overwhelming evidence must
necessarily call into question his/her character and moral judgement on this and
other issues.
Consider these points.
1. Right to choose what? While our society favors one's having
the right to choose to marry, it does not favor the right to choose
to abuse the one you marry. Whether you should favor a "right to choose" depends
on what you're choosing.
2. What does one choose to destroy in an abortion? Just read
the text "Abortion Practice" by Dr. Warren Hern. He describes how to tear the
arms and legs off of the fetus. In regard to even the earliest abortions, listen
to these medical and legal sources:
The widely used medical textbook The Developing Human, Clinically
Oriented Embryology, 6th Edition, Moore, Persaud, Saunders, 1998, states at
page 2 that "The intricate processes by which a baby develops from a single cell
are miraculous .... This cell [the zygote] results from the union of an oocyte
[egg] and sperm. A zygote is the beginning of a new human being ...." At page 18
this theme is repeated: "Human development begins at fertilization
[emphasis in original] ...."
Judge Michael J. Noonan ruled as follows in a New Jersey case based on a
man's efforts to save his unborn child from being aborted: "…based upon the
undisputed medical testimony by arguably the foremost authority in genetics in
the world, I found that human life begins as conception; and that Roe vs.
Wade permits a legal execution of that human being." (MUNICIPAL COURT OF NEW
JERSEY, LAW DIVISION - MORRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL ACTION DOCKET NO. C1771, ET SEQ.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY V. ALEXANDER LOCE, et als. DEFENDANTS APRIL 29, 1991
HONORABLE MICHAEL J. NOONAN)
Furthermore, even if one is not sure when human life begins, how can you
destroy what might be human? If you are hunting and don't know whether
what is moving behind the bush is a bear or a man, can you shoot?
3. How far into pregnancy does the "right to choose" extend?
Here is the answer, straight from the text of the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court
abortion decision:
"(a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the
abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of
the pregnant woman's attending physician. Pp. 163, 164.
(b) For the stage subsequent to approximately the end of the first trimester,
the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, may, if it
chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to
maternal health. Pp. 163, 164.
(c) For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its
interest in the potentiality of human life, may, if it chooses, regulate, and
even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical
judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother. Pp. 163-164;
164-165." (410 U.S. 113, 114)
According to the pro-choice Alan Guttmacher Institute web site, close
to 14,000 legal abortions a year are at 21 weeks of pregnancy or more. Martin
Haskell's medical paper on partial-birth abortion talks about the procedure
sometimes being done at "32 weeks or more."
4. What does an exception for "health" mean? Anything. Here are
the words of the Doe vs. Bolton decision (companion of Roe vs. Wade) of the
Supreme Court:
"Whether, in the words of the Georgia statute, "an abortion is necessary" is
a professional judgment that the Georgia physician will be called upon to make
routinely. We agree with the District Court, 319 F. Supp., at 1058, that the
medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors - physical,
emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age - relevant to the
wellbeing of the patient. All these factors may relate to health. This allows
the attending physician the room he needs to make his best medical judgment."
[410 U.S. 179, 192]
5. How often do abortions happen in America? The pro-choice
Alan Guttmacher Institute web site says, "In 1996, 1.37 million abortions
took place, down from an estimated 1.61 million in 1990. From 1973 through 1996,
more than 34 million legal abortions occurred." This means there are almost 4000
abortions a day, one every 23 seconds. No crime or disease takes that many
lives. More die by abortion in a year than the total of US casualties by all the
wars we have ever fought combined. More die by abortion in 5 days than have been
executed by capital punishment in 400 years.
6. Why do abortions occur in America? The pro-choice Alan
Guttmacher Institute web site says, "On average, women give at least 3
reasons for choosing abortion: 3/4 say that having a baby would interfere with
work, school or other responsibilities; about 2/3 say they cannot afford a
child; and 1/2 say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems
with their husband or partner." These don't sound like medical reasons.
7. How does abortion affect the health of women? Pro-choice
researchers writing in the August issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry
have acknowledged that some women experience post-abortion syndrome (PAS). The
research team, led by Dr. Brenda Major, diagnosed PAS with a frequency that
would translate into 560,000 cases. And according to a new study presented at
the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society (APS) held this June in
Miami Beach, Florida, women who undergo abortions are at greater risk for mental
health problems in subsequent years. See more research at www.afterabortion.org.
8. Are sea turtles more valuable than babies? We read in
Florida law, "No person may take, possess, disturb, mutilate, destroy, cause to
be destroyed, sell, offer for sale, transfer, molest, or harass any marine
turtle nest or eggs at any time." (370.12) If we don't have the right to choose
to smash the egg of a sea turtle, why should we have the right to choose to
smash a baby?
9. What is our message? To be pro-life is to be pro-woman. We
offer help to those who feel they have no choice (1-800-848-LOVE), healing to
those who have had abortions (1-800-5-WE-CARE), and education for all to be
involved in the pro-life effort (www.priestsforlife.org). We don't say, "Love
the baby and forget the mother." Rather, we say, "Why can't we love them
both?"
10. A message from the former Jane Roe of Roe vs. Wade: "Some
candidates in our upcoming election say that they support Roe vs. Wade. Take it
from me: they don't know what's good for women or for America. They talk about a
"woman's right to choose." What an insult! Women don't get abortions because of
freedom of choice. They get them because they feel they have no choice -- and
it's usually the man who is making sure they have no choice! Abortion is not
good for America, and Roe should be overturned. I am proud to be Roe no more!"
--Norma McCorvey, Dallas TX, October 24, 2000
We challenge anyone who calls him or herself "pro-choice" to refute the above
points. Moreover, we challenge them to do it with facts, and not mindless
name-calling. And all voters, no matter what their religious affiliation, should
honestly consider these points and ask themselves whether they can vote for
candidates who support the "right to choose" when they go to the polls on
November 7th.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This ad is also endorsed by the Taskforce of United Methodists on Abortion
and Sexuality (TUMAS), a member of the National Pro-life Religious Council.
Fr. Frank Pavone is a priest of the Archdiocese of New York and was
authorized by John Cardinal O'Connor to lead the Priests for Life movement since
1993.