HUMANAE VITAE
On Human Life
Encyclical Letter by Pope Paul VI
July 25, 1968
CONTENTS
1. The Transmission of Life
I. New Aspects of the Problem and
Competency of the Magisterium
2-3.New Formulation of the Problem
4. Competency of the Magisterium
5. Special Studies
6. Reply of the Magisterium
II. Doctrinal Principles
7-8. A Total Vision of Man
9. Its Characteristics
10. Responsible Parenthood
11. Respect for the Nature and Purpose of the Marriage Act
12. Two Inseparable Aspects: Union and Procreation
13. Faithfulness to God's Design
14. Illicit Ways of Regulating Birth
15. Licitness of Therapeutic Means
16. Licitness of Recourse to Infecund Periods
17. Grave Consequences of Methods of Artificial Birth Control
18. The Church, Guarantor of True Human Values
III. Pastoral Directives
19. The Church, Mater et Magistra
20. Possibility of Observing the Divine Law
21. Mastery of Self
22. Creating an Atmosphere Favorable to Chastity
23. Appeal to Public Authorities
24. To Men of Science
25. To Christian Husbands and Wives
26. Apostolate in Homes
27. To Doctors and Medical Personnel
28-29. To Priests
30.To Bishops
31. Final Appeal
To the venerable Patriarchs, Archbishops and Bishops and other local
ordinaries in peace and communion with the Apostolic See, to priests, the
faithful and to all men of good will:
Venerable brothers and beloved sons:
The Transmission of Life
1. The most serious duty of transmitting human life, for which married
persons are the free and responsible collaborators of God the Creator, has
always been a source of great joys to them, even if sometimes accompanied by not
a few difficulties and by distress.
At all times the fulfillment of this duty has posed grave problems to the
conscience of married persons, but, with the recent evolution of society,
changes have taken place that give rise to new questions which the Church could
not ignore, having to do with a matter which so closely touches upon the life
and happiness of men.
I. New Aspects of the Problem and
Competency of the Magisterium
New Formulation of the Problem
2. The changes which have taken place are in fact noteworthy and of varied
kinds. In the first place, there is the rapid demographic development. Fear is
shown by many that world population is growing more rapidly than the available
resources, with growing distress to many families and developing countries, so
that the temptation for authorities to counter this danger with radical measures
is great. Moreover, working and lodging conditions, as well as increased
exigencies both in the economic field and in that of education, often make the
proper education of an elevated number of children difficult today. A change is
also seen both in the manner of considering the person of woman and her place in
society, and in the value to be attributed to conjugal love in marriage, and
also in the appreciation to be made of the meaning of conjugal acts in relation
to that love.
Finally and above all, man has made stupendous progress in the domination and
rational organization of the forces of nature, such that he tends to extend this
domination to his own total being: to the body, to psychical life, to social
life and even to the laws which regulate the transmission of life.
3. This new state of things gives rise to new questions. Granted the
conditions of life today, and granted the meaning which conjugal relations have
with respect to the harmony between husband and wife and to their mutual
fidelity, would not a revision of the ethical norms, in force up to now, seem to
be advisable, especially when it is considered that they cannot be observed
without sacrifices, sometimes heroic sacrifices?
And again: by extending to this field the application of the so-called
"principle of totality," could it not be admitted that the intention of a less
abundant but more rationalized fecundity might transform a materially
sterilizing intervention into a licit and wise control of birth? Could it not be
admitted, that is, that the finality of procreation pertains to the ensemble of
conjugal life, rather than to its single acts? It is also asked whether, in view
of the increased sense of responsibility of modern man, the moment has not come
for him to entrust to his reason and his will, rather than to the biological
rhythms of his organism, the task of regulating birth.
Competency of the Magisterium
4. Such questions required from the teaching authority of the Church a new
and deeper reflection upon the principles of the moral teaching on marriage: a
teaching founded on the natural law, illuminated and enriched by divine
revelation.
No believer will wish to deny that the teaching authority of the Church is
competent to interpret even the natural moral law. It is, in fact, indisputable,
as our predecessors have many times declared, (1) that Jesus
Christ, when communicating to Peter and to the apostles His divine authority and
sending them to teach all nations His commandments, (2)
constituted them as guardians and authentic interpreters of all the moral law,
not only, that is, of the law of the Gospel, but also of the natural law, which
is also an expression of the will of God, the faithful fulfillment of which is
equally necessary for salvation. (3)
Conformably to this mission of hers, the Church has always provided-and even
more amply in recent times-a coherent teaching concerning both the nature of
marriage and the correct use of conjugal rights and the duties of husband and
wife.
Special Studies
5. The consciousness of that same mission induced us to confirm and enlarge
the study commission which our predecessor Pope John XXIII of happy memory had
instituted in March, 1963. That commission which included, besides several
experts in the various pertinent disciplines, also married couples, had as its
scope the gathering of opinions on the new questions regarding conjugal life,
and in particular on the regulation of births, and of furnishing opportune
elements of information so that the magisterium could give an adequate reply to
the expectation not only of the faithful, but also of world opinion. (5)
The work of these experts, as well as the successive judgments and counsels
spontaneously forwarded by or expressly requested from a good number of our
brothers in the episcopate, have permitted us to measure more exactly all the
aspects of this complex matter. Hence with all our heart we express to each of
them our lively gratitude.
Reply of the Magisterium
6. The conclusions at which the commission arrived could not, nevertheless,
be considered by us as definitive, nor dispense us from a personal examination
of this serious question; and this also because, within the commission itself,
no full concordance of judgments concerning the moral norms to be proposed had
been reached, and above all because certain criteria of solutions had emerged
which departed from the moral teaching on marriage proposed with constant
firmness by the teaching authority of the Church.
Therefore, having attentively sifted the documentation laid before us, after
mature reflection and assiduous prayers, we now intend, by virtue of the mandate
entrusted to us by Christ, to give our reply to these grave questions.
II. Doctrinal Principles
A Total Vision of Man
7. The problem of birth, like every other problem regarding human life, is to
be considered, beyond partial perspectives-whether of the biological or
psychological, demographic or sociological orders-in the light of an integral
vision of man and of his vocation, not only his natural and earthly, but also
his supernatural and eternal vocation. And since, in the attempt to justify
artificial methods of birth control, many have appealed to the demands both of
conjugal love and of "responsible parenthood" it is good to state very precisely
the true concept of these two great realities of married life, referring
principally to what was recently set forth in this regard, and in a highly
authoritative form, by the Second Vatican Council in its pastoral constitution
Gaudium et Spes (Constitution on the Church in the Modern World).
8. Conjugal love reveals its true nature and nobility when it is considered
in its supreme origin, God, who is love, (6) "the Father, from
whom every family in Heaven and on earth is named." (7)
Marriage is not, then, the effect of chance or the product of evolution of
unconscious natural forces; it is the wise institution of the Creator to realize
in mankind His design of love. By means of the reciprocal personal gift of self,
proper and exclusive to them, husband and wife tend towards the communion of
their beings in view of mutual personal perfection, to collaborate with God in
the generation and education of new lives.
For baptized persons, moreover, marriage invests the dignity of a sacramental
sign of grace, inasmuch as it represents the union of Christ and of the Church.
Its Characteristics
9. Under this light, there clearly appear the characteristic marks and
demands of conjugal love, and it is of supreme importance to have an exact idea
of these.
This love is first of all fully human, that is to say, of the senses and of
the spirit at the same time. It is not, then, a simple transport of instinct and
sentiment, but also, and principally, an act of the free will, intended to
endure and to grow by means of the joys and sorrows of daily life, in such a way
that husband and wife become one only heart and one only soul, and together
attain their human perfection.
Then, this love is total, that is to say, it is a very special form of
personal friendship, in which husband and wife generously share everything,
without undue reservations or selfish calculations. Whoever truly loves his
marriage partner loves not only for what he receives, but for the partner's
self, rejoicing that he can enrich his partner with the gift of himself.
Again, this love is faithful and exclusive until death. Thus in fact do bride
and groom conceive it to be on the day when they freely and in full awareness
assume the duty of the marriage bond. A fidelity, this, which can sometimes be
difficult, but is always possible, always noble and meritorious, as no one can
deny. The example of so many married persons down through the centuries shows,
not only that fidelity is according to the nature of marriage, but also that it
is a source of profound and lasting happiness and finally, this love is fecund
for it is not exhausted by the communion between husband and wife, but is
destined to continue, raising up new lives. "Marriage and conjugal love are by
their nature ordained toward the begetting and educating of children. Children
are really the supreme gift of marriage and contribute very substantially to the
welfare of their parents." (8)
Responsible Parenthood
10. Hence conjugal love requires in husband and wife an awareness of their
mission of "responsible parenthood," which today is rightly much insisted upon,
and which also must be exactly understood. Consequently it is to be considered
under different aspects which are legitimate and connected with one another.
In relation to the biological processes, responsible parenthood means the
knowledge and respect of their functions; human intellect discovers in the power
of giving life biological laws which are part of the human person.
(9)
In relation to the tendencies of instinct or passion, responsible parenthood
means that necessary dominion which reason and will must exercise over them.
In relation to physical, economic, psychological and social conditions,
responsible parenthood is exercised, either by the deliberate and generous
decision to raise a numerous family, or by the decision, made for grave motives
and with due respect for the moral law, to avoid for the time being, or even for
an indeterminate period, a new birth.
Responsible parenthood also and above all implies a more profound
relationship to the objective moral order established by God, of which a right
conscience is the faithful interpreter. The responsible exercise of parenthood
implies, therefore, that husband and wife recognize fully their own duties
towards God, towards themselves, towards the family and towards society, in a
correct hierarchy of values.
In the task of transmitting life, therefore, they are not free to proceed
completely at will, as if they could determine in a wholly autonomous way the
honest path to follow; but they must conform their activity to the creative
intention of God, expressed in the very nature of marriage and of its acts, and
manifested by the constant teaching of the Church." (10)
Respect for the Nature and Purpose of the Marriage Act
11. These acts, by which husband and wife are united in chaste intimacy, and
by means of which human life is transmitted, are, as the council recalled,
"noble and worthy," (11) and they do not cease to be lawful
if, for causes independent of the will of husband and wife, they are foreseen to
be infecund, since they always remain ordained towards expressing and
consolidating their union. In fact, as experience bears witness, not every
conjugal act is followed by a new life. God has wisely disposed natural laws and
rhythms of fecundity which, of themselves, cause a separation in the succession
of births. Nonetheless the Church, calling men back to the observance of the
norms of the natural law, as interpreted by its constant doctrine teaches that
each and every marriage act (quilibet matrimonii usus) must remain open to the
transmission of life. (12)
Two Inseparable Aspects: Union and Procreation
12. That teaching, often set forth by the magisterium, is founded upon the
inseparable connection, willed by God and unable to be broken by man on his own
initiative, between the two meanings of the conjugal act: the unitive meaning
and the procreative meaning. Indeed, by its intimate structure, the conjugal
act, while most closely uniting husband and wife, capacitates them for the
generation of new lives, according to laws inscribed in the very being of man
and of woman. By safeguarding both these essential aspects, the unitive and the
procreative, the conjugal act preserves in its fullness the sense of true mutual
love and its ordination towards man's most high calling to parenthood. We
believe that the men of our day are particularly capable of seizing the deeply
reasonable and human character of this fundamental principle.
Faithfulness to God's Design
13. It is in fact justly observed that a conjugal act imposed upon one's
partner without regard for his or her condition and lawful desires is not a true
act of love, and therefore denies an exigency of right moral order in the
relationships between husband and wife. Hence, one who reflects well must also
recognize that a reciprocal act of love, which jeopardizes the responsibility to
transmit life which God the Creator, according to particular laws, inserted
therein, is in contradiction with the design constitutive of marriage, and with
the will of the Author of life. To use this divine gift destroying, even if only
partially, its meaning and its purpose is to contradict the nature both of man
and of woman and of their most intimate relationship, and therefore it is to
contradict also the plan of God and His will. On the other hand, to make use of
the gift of conjugal love while respecting the laws of the generative process
means to acknowledge oneself not to be the arbiter of the sources of human life,
but rather the minister of the design established by the Creator. In fact, just
as man does not have unlimited dominion over his body in general, so also, with
particular reason, he has no such dominion over his generative faculties as
such, because of their intrinsic ordination towards raising up life, of which
God is the principle. "Human life is sacred," Pope John XXIII recalled; "from
its very inception it reveals the creating hand of God." (13)
Illicit Ways of Regulating Birth
14. In conformity with these landmarks in the human and Christian vision of
marriage, we must once again declare that the direct interruption of the
generative process already begun, and, above all, directly willed and procured
abortion, even if for therapeutic reasons, are to be absolutely excluded as
licit means of regulating birth. (14)
Equally to be excluded, as the teaching authority of the Church has
frequently declared, is direct sterilization, whether perpetual or temporary,
whether of the man or of the woman. (15) Similarly excluded is
every action which, either in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its
accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes,
whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible.
(16)
To justify conjugal acts made intentionally infecund, one cannot invoke as
valid reasons the lesser evil, or the fact that such acts would constitute a
whole together with the fecund acts already performed or to follow later, and
hence would share in one and the same moral goodness. In truth, if it is
sometimes licit to tolerate a lesser evil in order to avoid a greater evil or to
promote a greater good, (17) it is not licit, even for the
gravest reasons, to do evil so that good may follow therefrom, (18) that is, to make into the object of a positive act of the
will something which is intrinsically disorder, and hence unworthy of the human
person, even when the intention is to safeguard or promote individual, family or
social well-being. Consequently it is an error to think that a conjugal act
which is deliberately made infecund and so is intrinsically dishonest could be
made honest and right by the ensemble of a fecund conjugal life.
Licitness of Therapeutic Means
15. The Church, on the contrary, does not at all consider illicit the use of
those therapeutic means truly necessary to cure diseases of the organism, even
if an impediment to procreation, which may be foreseen, should result therefrom,
provided such impediment is not, for whatever motive, directly willed.
(19)
Licitness of Recourse to Infecund Periods
16. To this teaching of the Church on conjugal morals, the objection is made
today, as we observed earlier (no. 3), that it is the prerogative of the human
intellect to dominate the energies offered by irrational nature and to orientate
them towards an end conformable to the good of man. Now, some may ask: in the
present case, is it not reasonable in many circumstances to have recourse to
artificial birth control if, thereby, we secure the harmony and peace of the
family, and better conditions for the education of the children already born? To
this question it is necessary to reply with clarity: the Church is the first to
praise and recommend the intervention of intelligence in a function which so
closely associates the rational creature with his Creator; but the affirms that
this must be done with respect for the order established by God.
If, then, there are serious motives to space out births, which derive from
the physical or psychological conditions of husband and wife, or from external
conditions, the Church teaches that it is then licit to take into account the
natural rhythms immanent in the generative functions, for the use of marriage in
the infecund periods only, and in this way to regulate birth without offending
the moral principles which have been recalled earlier. (20)
The Church is coherent with herself when she considers recourse to the
infecund periods to be licit, while at the same time condemning, as being always
illicit, the use of means directly contrary to fecundation, even if such use is
inspired by reasons which may appear honest and serious. In reality, there are
essential differences between the two cases; in the former, the married couple
make legitimate use of a natural disposition; in the latter, they impede the
development of natural processes. It is true that, in the one and the other
case, the married couple are concordant in the positive will of avoiding
children for plausible reasons, seeking the certainty that offspring will not
arrive; but it is also true that only in the former case are they able to
renounce the use of marriage in the fecund periods when, for just motives,
procreation is not desirable, while making use of it during infecund periods to
manifest their affection and to safeguard their mutual fidelity. By so doing,
they give proof of a truly and integrally honest love.
Grave Consequences of Methods of Artificial Birth Control
17. Upright men can even better convince themselves of the solid grounds on
which the teaching of the Church in this field is based, if they care to reflect
upon the consequences of methods of artificial birth control. Let them consider,
first of all, how wide and easy a road would thus be opened up towards conjugal
infidelity and the general lowering of morality. Not much experience is needed
in order to know human weakness, and to understand that men-especially the
young, who are so vulnerable on this point-have need of encouragement to be
faithful to the moral law, so that they must not be offered some easy means of
eluding its observance. It is also to be feared that the man, growing used to
the employment of anticonceptive practices, may finally lose respect for the
woman and, no longer caring for her physical and psychological equilibrium, may
come to the point of considering her as a mere instrument of selfish enjoyment,
and no longer as his respected and beloved companion.
Let it be considered also that a dangerous weapon would thus be placed in the
hands of those public authorities who take no heed of moral exigencies. Who
could blame a government for applying to the solution of the problems of the
community those means acknowledged to be licit for married couples in the
solution of a family problem? Who will stop rulers from favoring, from even
imposing upon their peoples, if they were to consider it necessary, the method
of contraception which they judge to be most efficacious? In such a way men,
wishing to avoid individual, family, or social difficulties encountered in the
observance of the divine law, would reach the point of placing at the mercy of
the intervention of public authorities the most personal and most reserved
sector of conjugal intimacy.
Consequently, if the mission of generating life is not to be exposed to the
arbitrary will of men, one must necessarily recognize unsurmountable limits to
the possibility of man's domination over his own body and its functions; limits
which no man, whether a private individual or one invested with authority, may
licitly surpass. And such limits cannot be determined otherwise than by the
respect due to the integrity of the human organism and its functions, according
to the principles recalled earlier, and also according to the correct
understanding of the "principle of totality" illustrated by our predecessor Pope
Pius XII. (21)
The Church, Guarantor of True Human Values
18. It can be foreseen that this teaching will perhaps not be easily received
by all: Too numerous are those voices-amplified by the modern means of
propaganda-which are contrary to the voice of the Church. To tell the truth, the
Church is not surprised to be made, like her divine founder, a "sign of
contradiction," (22)
yet she does not because of this cease to proclaim with humble firmness the
entire moral law, both natural and evangelical. Of such laws the Church was not
the author, nor consequently can she be their arbiter; she is only their
depositary and their interpreter, without ever being able to declare to be licit
that which is not so by reason of its intimate an unchangeable opposition to the
true good of man.
In defending conjugal morals in their integral wholeness, the Church knows
that she contributes towards the establishment of a truly human civilization;
she engages man not to abdicate from his own responsibility in order to rely on
technical means; by that very fact she defends the dignity of man and wife.
Faithful to both the teaching and the example of the Savior, she shows herself
to be the sincere and disinterested friend of men, whom she wishes to help, even
during their earthly sojourn, "to share as sons in the life of the living God,
the Father of all men." (23)
III. Pastoral Directives
The Church, Mater et Magistra
19. Our words would not be an adequate expression of the thought and
solicitude of the Church, mother and teacher of all peoples, if, after having
recalled men to the observance and respect of the divine law regarding
matrimony, we did not strengthen them in the path of honest regulation of birth,
even amid the difficult conditions which today afflict families and peoples. The
Church, in fact, cannot have a different conduct towards men than that of the
Redeemer. She knows their weaknesses, has compassion on the crowd, receives
sinners; but she cannot renounce the teaching of the law which is, in reality,
that law proper to a human life restored to its original truth and conducted by
the spirit of God. (24)
Possibility of Observing the Divine Law
20. The teaching of the Church on the regulation of birth, which promulgates
the divine law, will easily appear to many to be difficult or even impossible of
actuation. And indeed, like all great beneficent realities, it demands serious
engagement and much effort, individual, family and social effort. More than
that, it would not be practicable without the help of God, who upholds and
strengthens the good will of men. Yet, to anyone who reflects well, it cannot
but be clear that such efforts ennoble man and are beneficial to the human
community.
Mastery of Self
21. The honest practice of regulation of birth demands first of all that
husband and wife acquire and possess solid convictions concerning the true
values of life and of the family, and that they tend towards securing perfect
self-mastery. To dominate instinct by means of one's reason and free will
undoubtedly requires ascetical practices, so that the affective manifestations
of conjugal life may observe the correct order, in particular with regard to the
observance of periodic continence. Yet this discipline which is proper to the
purity of married couples, far from harming conjugal love, rather confers on it
a higher human value. It demands continual effort yet, thanks to its beneficent
influence, husband and wife fully develop their personalities, being enriched
with spiritual values. Such discipline bestows upon family life fruits of
serenity and peace, and facilitates the solution of other problems; it favors
attention for one's partner, helps both parties to drive out selfishness, the
enemy of true love; and deepens their sense of responsibility. By its means,
parents acquire the capacity of having a deeper and more efficacious influence
in the education of their offspring; little children and youths grow up with a
just appraisal of human values, and in the serene and harmonious development of
their spiritual and sensitive faculties.
Creating an Atmosphere Favorable to Chastity
22. On this occasion, we wish to draw the attention of educators, and of all
who perform duties of responsibility in regard to the common good of human
society, to the need of creating an atmosphere favorable to education in
chastity, that is, to the triumph of healthy liberty over license by means of
respect for the moral order.
Everything in the modern media of social communications which leads to sense
excitation and unbridled customs, as well as every form of pornography and
licentious performances, must arouse the frank and unanimous reaction of all
those who are solicitous for the progress of civilization and the defense of the
common good of the human spirit. Vainly would one seek to justify such
depravation with the pretext of artistic or scientific exigencies,
(25) or to deduce an argument from the freedom allowed in this sector by the
public authorities.
Appeal to Public Authorities
23. To rulers, who are those principally responsible for the common good, and
who can do so much to safeguard moral customs, we say: Do not allow the morality
of your peoples to be degraded; do not permit that by legal means practices
contrary to the natural and divine law be introduced into that fundamental cell,
the family. Quite other is the way in which public authorities can and must
contribute to the solution of the demographic problem: namely, the way of a
provident policy for the family, of a wise education of peoples in respect of
moral law and the liberty of citizens.
We are well aware of the serious difficulties experienced by public
authorities in this regard, especially in the developing countries. To their
legitimate preoccupations we devoted our encyclical letter Populorum Progressio
(The Development of Peoples). But with our predecessor Pope John XXIII, we
repeat: no solution to these difficulties is acceptable "which does violence to
man's essential dignity" and is based only on an utterly materialistic
conception of man himself and of his life. The only possible solution to this
question is one which envisages the social and economic progress both of
individuals and of the whole of human society, and which respects and promotes
true human values. (26) Neither can one, without grave
injustice, consider divine providence to be responsible for what depends,
instead, on a lack of wisdom in government, on an insufficient sense of social
justice, on selfish monopolization, or again on blameworthy indolence in
confronting the efforts and the sacrifices necessary to ensure the raising of
living standards of a people and of all its sons. (27)
May all responsible public authorities-as some are already doing so
laudably-generously revive their efforts. And may mutual aid between all the
members of the great human family never cease to grow: This is an almost
limitless field which thus opens up to the activity of the great international
organizations.
To Men of Science
24. We wish now to express our encouragement to men of science, who "can
considerably advance the welfare of marriage and the family, along with peace of
conscience, if by pooling their efforts they labor to explain more thoroughly
the various conditions favoring a proper regulation of births.
(28) It is particularly desirable that, according to the wish already
expressed by Pope Pius XII, medical science succeed in providing a sufficiently
secure basis for a regulation of birth, founded on the observance of natural
rhythms. (29) In this way, scientists and especially Catholic
scientists will contribute to demonstrate in actual fact that, as the Church
teaches, "a true contradiction cannot exist between the divine laws pertaining
to the transmission of life and those pertaining to the fostering of authentic
conjugal love." (30)
To Christian Husbands and Wives
25. And now our words more directly address our own children, particularly
those whom God calls to serve Him in marriage. The Church, while teaching
imprescriptible demands of the divine law, announces the tidings of salvation,
and by means of the sacraments opens up the paths of grace, which makes man a
new creature, capable of corresponding with love and true freedom to the design
of his Creator and Savior, and of finding the yoke of Christ to be sweet.
(31)
Christian married couples, then, docile to her voice, must remember that
their Christian vocation, which began at baptism, is further specified and
reinforced by the sacrament of matrimony. By it husband and wife are
strengthened and as it were consecrated for the faithful accomplishment of their
proper duties, for the carrying out of their proper vocation even to perfection,
and the Christian witness which is proper to them before the whole world.
(32) To them the Lord entrusts the task of making visible to men the
holiness and sweetness of the law which unites the mutual love of husband and
wife with their cooperation with the love of God, the author of human life.
We do not at all intend to hide the sometimes serious difficulties inherent
in the life of Christian married persons; for them as for everyone else, "the
gate is narrow and the way is hard, that leads to life." (33)
But the hope of that life must illuminate their way, as with courage they strive
to live with wisdom, justice and piety in this present time, (34)
knowing that the figure of this world passes away. (35)
Let married couples, then, face up to the efforts needed, supported by the
faith and hope which "do not disappoint...because God's love has been poured
into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us."
(36) Let them implore divine assistance by persevering prayer; above all,
let them draw from the source of grace and charity in the Eucharist. And if sin
should still keep its hold over them, let them not be discouraged, but rather
have recourse with humble perseverance to the mercy of God, which is poured
forth in the sacrament of Penance. In this way they will be enabled to achieve
the fullness of conjugal life described by the Apostle: "husbands, love your
wives, as Christ loved the Church...husbands should love their wives as their
own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no man ever hates his own
flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, as Christ does the Church...this is a
great mystery, and I mean in reference to Christ and the Church. However, let
each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects
her husband." (37)
Apostolate in Homes
26. Among the fruits which ripen forth from a generous effort of fidelity to
the divine law, one of the most precious is that married couples themselves not
infrequently feel the desire to communicate their experience to others. Thus
there comes to be included in the vast pattern of the vocation of the laity a
new and most noteworthy form of the apostolate of like to like; it is married
couples themselves who become apostles and guides to other married couples. This
is assuredly, among so many forms of apostolate, one of those which seem most
opportune today. (38)
To Doctors and Medical Personnel
27. We hold those physicians and medical personnel in the highest esteem who,
in the exercise of their profession, value above every human interest the
superior demands of their Christian vocation. Let them persevere, therefore, in
promoting on every occasion the discovery of solutions inspired by faith and
right reason, let them strive to arouse this conviction and this respect in
their associates. Let them also consider as their proper professional duty the
task of acquiring all the knowledge needed in this delicate sector, so as to be
able to give to those married persons who consult them wise counsel and healthy
direction, such as they have a right to expect.
To Priests
28. Beloved priest sons, by vocation you are the counselors and spiritual
guides of individual persons and of families. We now turn to you with
confidence. Your first task-especially in the case of those who teach moral
theology-is to expound the Church's teaching on marriage without ambiguity. Be
the first to give, in the exercise of your ministry, the example of loyal
internal and external obedience to the teaching authority of the Church. That
obedience, as you know well, obliges not only because of the reasons adduced,
but rather because of the light of the Holy Spirit, which is given in a
particular way to the pastors of the Church in order that they may illustrate
the truth. (39) You know, too, that it is of the utmost importance, for
peace of consciences and for the unity of the Christian people, that in the
field of morals as well as in that of dogma, all should attend to the
magisterium of the Church, and all should speak the same language. Hence, with
all our heart we renew to you the heartfelt plea of the great Apostle Paul: "I
appeal to you, brethren, by the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you
agree and that there be no dissension's among you, but that you be united in the
same mind and the same judgment." (40)
29. To diminish in no way the saving teaching of Christ constitutes an
eminent form of charity for souls. But this must ever be accompanied by patience
and goodness, such as the Lord himself gave example of in dealing with men.
Having come not to condemn but to save, (41) He was intransigent with evil, but merciful toward
individuals.
In their difficulties, may married couples always find, in the words and in
the heart of a priest, the echo of the voice and the love of the Redeemer.
And then speak with confidence, beloved sons, fully convinced that the spirit
of God, while He assists the magisterium in proposing doctrine, illumines
internally the hearts of the faithful inviting them to give their assent. Teach
married couples the indispensable way of prayer; prepare them to have recourse
often and with faith to the sacraments of the Eucharist and of Penance, without
ever allowing themselves to be discouraged by their own weakness.
To Bishops
30. Beloved and venerable brothers in the episcopate, with whom we most
intimately share the solicitude of the spiritual good of the people of God, at
the conclusion of this encyclical our reverent and affectionate thoughts turn to
you. To all of you we extend an urgent invitation. At the head of the priests,
your collaborators, and of your faithful, work ardently and incessantly for the
safeguarding and the holiness of marriage, so that it may always be lived in its
entire human and Christian fullness. Consider this mission as one of your most
urgent responsibilities at the present time.
As you know, it implies concerted pastoral action in all the fields of human
activity, economic, cultural and social; for, in fact, only a simultaneous
improvement in these various sectors will make it possible to render the life of
parents and of children within their families not only tolerable, but easier and
more joyous, to render the living together in human society more fraternal and
peaceful, in faithfulness to God's design for the world.
Final Appeal
31. Venerable brothers, most beloved sons, and all men of good will, great
indeed is the work of education, of progress and of love to which we call you,
upon the foundation of the Church's teaching, of which the successor of Peter
is, together with his brothers in the episcopate, the depositary and
interpreter. Truly a great work, as we are deeply convinced, both for the world
and for the Church, since man cannot find true happiness-towards which he
aspires with all his being-other than in respect of the laws written by God in
his very nature, laws which he must observe with intelligence and love. Upon
this work, and upon all of you, and especially upon married couples, we invoke
the abundant graces of the God of holiness and mercy, and in pledge thereof we
impart to you all our apostolic blessing.
Given at Rome, from St. Peter's, this 25th day of July, feast of St. James
the Apostle, in the year 1968, the sixth of our pontificate.
PAULUS PP. VI.
[Return to top]
NOTES
- Cf. Pius XI, Encyclical Qui pluribus: Pii IX P.M. Acta,
1, pp.9-10; St. Pius X, Encycl. Singulari quadam, AAS 4 (1912), p.
658; Piux XI, Encycl. Casti Connubii, AAS 22 (1930), pp. 579-581
(C.T.S. translation, nn. 107-109); Pius XII, Address Magnificate Dominum
to the Episcopate of the Catholic World, AAS 46 (1954), pp. 671-672; John
XXIII, Encyl. Mater et Magistra, AAS 53 (1961), p. 457 (C.T.S.
translation, n. 239).
- Cf. Mt 28:18-19.
- Cf. Mt 7:21.
- Cf. Council of Trent Roman Catechism, Part II, ch. 8; Leo
XIII, Encycl. Arcanum: Acta Leonis XIII, 2 (1880), pp. 26-29; Pius
XI, Encycl. Divini Illius Magistri, AAS 22 (1930), pp. 58-61 (C.T.S.
translation, nn. 32-41; Pius XI, Encycl. Casti Connubii, AAS 22
(1930), PP. 545-546 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 16-18); Pius XII, Address to
the Italian Medico-Biological Union of St. Luke, Discorsi e Radiomessaggi,
VI, pp. 191-192; to the Italian Association of Catholic Midwives, AAS 43
(1951), pp. 835-854 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 1-71); to the Association known
as the 'Family Campaign' and other Family Associations, AAS 43 (1951), pp.
857-859 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 6-15); to the seventh Congress of the
International Society of Haematology, AAS 50 (1958), pp. 734-735; John
XXIII, Encycl. Mater et Magistra, AAS 53 (1961), pp. 446-447 (C.T.S.
translation, nn. 188-192; Vatican Council II, Pastoral Constitution on the
Church in the World of Today Gaudium et spes, nn. 47-52, AAS 58
(1966), pp. 1067-1074; Code of Canon Law, Canons 1067, 1068 .1, Canon
1076.1-2.
- Cf. Paul VI, Address to the Sacred College of Cardinals,
AAS 56 (1964), p. 588; to the Commission for the Study of Problems of
Population, Family and Birth, AAS 57 (1965), p. 388; to the National
Congress of the Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AAS 58
(1966), p. 1168.
- Cf. 1 Jn 4:8.
- Eph 3:15.
- Vatican Council II, Pastoral Constitutions on the Church
in the World of Today Gaudium et spes, n. 50, AAS 58 (1966), pp.
1070-1072.
- Cf. St. Thomas, Summa Theologica, I-II, q. 94, art.
2.
- Cf. Vatican Council II, Pastoral Constitution on the
Church in the World of Today Gaudium et spes, nn. 50-51, AAS 58
(1968), pp. 1070-1073.
- Cf. ibid., n. 49, AAS 58 (1966), p. 1070.
- Cf. Pius XI, Encycl. Casti Connubii, AAS 22
(1930), p. 560 (C.T.S. translation, n. 56); Pius XII, Address to Midwives,
AAS 43 (1951), p. 843 (C.T.S. translation, n. 24).
- Cf. John XXIII, Encycl. Mater et Magistra, AAS 53
(1961), p. 447 (C.T.S. translation, n. 194).
- Cf. Council of Trent Roman Catechism, Part II, ch. 8;
Pius XI Encycl. Casti Connubii, AAS 22 (1930), pp. 562-564 (C.T.S.
translation, nn. 62-66); Pius XII, Address to the Medico-Biological Union of
St. Luke, Discorsi e Radiomessaggi, VI, pp. 191-192; Address to
Midwives, AAS 43 (1951), pp. 842-843 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 20-26);
Address to the 'Family Campaign' and other Family Associations, AAS 43
(1951), pp. 857-859 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 6-15); John XXIII, Encycl.
Pacem in terris, AAS 55 (1963), pp. 259-260 (C.T.S. translation, nn.
8-13); Vatican Council II, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the World
of Today Gaudium et spes, n. 51, AAS 58 (1966), p. 1072.
- Cf. Pius XI, Encycl. Casti Connubii, AAS 22
(1930), p. 565 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 67-70); Decree of the Holy Office,
22 Feb. 1940, AAS 32 (1940), p. 73; Pius XII, Address to Midwives, AAS 43
(1951), pp. 843-844 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 24-28); to the Society of
Haematology, AAS 50 (1958), pp. 734-735.
- Cf. Council of Trent Roman Catechism, Part II, ch. 8;
Pius XI Encycl. Casti Connubii, AAS 22 (1930), pp. 559-561 (C.T.S.
translation, nn. 53-57); Pius XII, Address to Midwives, AAS 43 (1951), pp.
843 (C.T.S. translation, n. 24); to the Society of Haematology, AAS 50
(1958), pp. 734-735; John XXIII Mater et Magistra, AAS 53 (1961), p.
447 (C.T.S. translation, n. 193).
- Cf. Pius XII, Address to the National Congress of the
Italian Society of the Union of Catholic Jurists, AAS 45 (1953), pp.
798-799.
- Cf. Rom 3:8.
- Cf. Pius XII, Address to the twenty-sixth Congress of the
Italian Association of Urology, AAS 45 (1953), pp. 674-675; to the Society
of Haematology, AAS 50 (1958), pp. 734-735.
- Cf. Pius XII, Address to Midwives, AAS 43 (1951), p. 846
(C.T.S. translation n. 36).
- Cf. Pius XII, Address to the Association of Urology, AAS
45 (1953), pp. 674-675; to Leaders and Members of the Italian Association of
'corneae' donors and the Italian Association of the Blind, AAS 48 (1956),
pp. 461-462.
- Lk. 2:34.
- Cf. Paul VI, Encycl. Populorum progressio, AAS 59
(1967), p. 268 (C.T.S. translation, n. 21).
- Cf. Rom 8.
- Cf. Vatican Council II, Decree on the Means of Mass
Communication Inter mirifica, nn. 6-7, AAS 56 (1964), p. 147.
- John XXIII, Encycl. Mater et Magistra, AAS 53
(1961), p. 447 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 191-192).
- Cf. Paul VI, Encycl. Populorum progressio, AAS 59
(1967), pp. 281-284 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 48-55).
- Vatican Council II, Pastoral Constitution on the Church
in the World of Today Gaudium et spes, n. 52 AAS 58 (1966), p. 1074.
- Cf. Pius XII, Address to the 'Family Campaign' and other
Family Associations. AAS 43 (1951), p. 859 (C.T.S. translation, nn. 14-15).
- Vatican Council II, Pastoral Constitution on the Church
in the World of Today Gaudium et spes, n. 51 AAS 58 (1966), p. 1072.
- Cf. Mt. 11:30.
- Cf. Vatican Council II, Pastoral Constitution on the
Church in the World of Today Gaudium et spes, n. 48 AAS 58 (1966),
pp. 1067-1069; Dogmatic Constitution on the Church Lumen gentium, n.
35 AAS 57 (1965), pp. 40-41.
- Mt 7:14; cf. Heb 12:11.
- Tit 2:12.
- 1 Cor 7:31.
- Rom 5:5.
- Eph 5:25, 28-29, 32-33.
- Cf. Vatican Council II, Dogmatic Constitution on the
Church Lumen gentium, n. 35, 41 AAS 57 (1965), pp. 40-45; Pastoral
Constitution on the Church in the World of Today Gaudium et spes, n.
48-49 AAS 58 (1966) pp. 1067-1070; Decree on the Apostolate of the Laity
Apostolicam Actuositatem, n. 11, AAS 58 (1966), pp. 847-849.
- Cf. Vatican Council II, Dogmatic Constitution on the
Church Lumen gentium, n. 25, AAS 57 (1965), pp. 29-31.
- 1 Cor 1:10.
- Cf. Jn 3:17.
Teachings of the
Magisterium on Abortion
[Return to top]